Ways of working
🚗 Spurious detail, false certainty – we need to get more comfortable with "just enough" by Public Digital director Audree Fletcher is one to bookmark and share. This one will be good for stakeholders who are planning-obsessed and prematurely thirsty for The Detail. Audree uses the analogy of a long car trip to explain which information is useful for someone overseeing a service transformation programme. “A way of gauging progress on the journey, and an update on time/petrol variance against forecast” is enough. Important that she also references the possibility of abandoning a trip entirely if the conditions just aren’t right.
💭 Related: teams working on the UK’s National Health Service app get together every 3 months to share their plans for the next quarter. They’re already identifying dependencies, duplication and areas for collaboration from January to March 2024 because “big ambitions for the future are being defined right now.” Nice bit on principles here: “We all know that things can change between agreeing to do a thing and actually doing it — don’t feel you have to plough on just because a decision was made several months ago.” Echoes Audree’s point.
😆 Grateful to product specialist John Cutler for giving those sprawling, messy pieces of work with loads of limiting constraints that make “our brains hurt a bit more” an authoritative adjective: project-ish. And then, “we have a name for Big Project-ish Projects: Big Messy Projects (BMPs),” he writes. Nice read.
💛 Digital sociologist Lisa Talia Moretti published Designing for a relationship, not a user last year but it’s still relevant. “As more public services and national infrastructure, like single sign-on accounts and identity, move online, the design of informal and formal support journeys will need to move from nice-to-have into the territory of accessible and inclusive design practice.” Makes us think about how much there is to learn by looking at how people have solved challenges in very different contexts, such as vastly different levels of internet access. More in-depth thinking here.
🦜 Not new news but nice to have a relatively long read on the Smart-talk trap – “an especially insidious inhibitor of organisational action.” Harvard Business School defines smart talkers as sounding confident, being eloquent, having interesting information and ideas but expressing themselves in unnecessarily complicated ways whilst focusing on the negative (“Pessimism sounds profound. Optimism sounds superficial,” – Professor Teresa Amabile). The piece identifies 5 things the best organisations do – the emphasis being on just that: doing. For example, leaders who also do the doing; creating processes that get stuff done; prioritising asking how so that ideas can be put in motion. Includes a wealth of examples. 3 time-guzzlers- Something nostalgic: Internet artifacts. FYI, 1982 was the year of the first smiley.
- Something cringe: Corporate Bro on tech conferences, and on AI.
- Something of an office fave: london.metro-memory.com
|